Showing posts with label non-self. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-self. Show all posts

Sunday 31 March 2013

Anatta or the concept of 'no-self'


Image by Bhikkhu Samahita on http://what-buddha-said.net
In your opinion, what would be the best way to explain the concept of “no-self” (anatta)?

Particularly in the West, people have been strongly influenced by Judeo-Christian teachings concerning the soul and its existence beyond this lifetime. This soul is the essence of the individual, created by a God, providing each with their uniqueness and subsequently going forth into eternity based on the state of the person at the time of death. According to this same “soul theory” while the individual and what constitutes them may change, the soul does not - it remains eternal and unchanged.

The grip of this idea of “self” or “soul” has been so strong, that Watson, a distinguished psychologist, stated: "No one has ever touched a soul or has seen one in a test tube or has in any way come into relationship with it as he has with the other objects of his daily experience. Nevertheless to doubt its existence is to become a heretic and once might possibly even had led to the loss of one's head."

These ideas are not unique to the era, but also formed part of the metaphysical teachings of the Upanishads dominant in India around the same time as the Buddha. According to them, the individual soul (Atman) was identical to the universal soul (Brahma) and final liberation meant merging the individual into the cosmic through meditation.

In stark contrast, the Buddha declared that clinging either to a notion of “self” or of “no self” leads to sorrow, lamentation, pain, grief and despair. In other words, they are not conducive to liberation. When these views are finally dropped, one can be freed of agitation and unbound.

Buddhism does not deny the personality or individual. Rather it analyses them into various material and psychological aggregates (such as the five khandhas). However, each of these aggregates changes, so cannot be themselves be the unchanging “soul”. Further, there is no other unchanging substance (soul) to which the aggregates adhere or to which they relate, since such a substance would also need to constantly change. 

If such a “soul” were to exist it would need to be independent. According to the Paticca Samuppāda, nothing is independent or arises without causes and conditions. The Buddha includes here not only living beings, but also the cosmos as a whole, since there is nothing in the experience of the cosmos which is eternal or unchanging. Based on this empirical approach, (there is nothing within or without that can be called “I” or “me”) there can never be an independent soul.

Narada Thera explains it well (in “Buddhism in a Nutshell”) when he states that the Buddhist philosophical term for an individual is santana, that is, a flux or a continuity, which includes both their mental and physical elements. These elements are bound together by the kammic force of each individual. “This uninterrupted flux or continuity of psycho-physical phenomenon, which is conditioned by kamma, and not limited only to the present life, but having its source in the beginningless past and its continuation in the future — is the Buddhist substitute for the permanent ego or the immortal soul of other religions.”

So, as Narada Mahathera states (in “The Buddha and His Teachings”) it is more appropriate to think of the so-called “self” as a process, not an identity.

(Written by Gregory Quinlivan for a course entitled 'Early Buddhism Basic Doctrines' in 2009 through the International Buddhist College, Thailand.)

Monday 10 October 2011

Handbook for Mankind - Tweeted Version

Tweets from “Handbook for Mankind” originally written by Ajahn Buddhadāsa Bhikkhu, the famous Thai Buddhist monk who belonged to the forest tradition and founded Suan Mokkh, an international meditation retreat centre. (Thai: พุทธทาสภิกขุ, May 27, 1906 - May 25, 1993)

Between September and December 2010 I sent just over 70 tweets summarising the main points from the book. I was both an experiment in reducing a text to bite-size pieces and a way of gaining a deeper understanding of this important document. Though I didn't tweet the whole book, I hope what I did send gave my readers some of the essence of its message.

1 Buddhism is a means of conquering birth, aging, pain and death, and destroying mental defilements.
2 The Buddha discovered how to conquer human fears, a practical method for eliminating suffering.
3 "Buddhism" means "the Teaching of the Enlightened One."
4 A Buddha is an enlightened individual who knows the truth about all things.
5 A Buddha knows "what is what" and behaves appropriately regarding all things.
6 Buddhism is based on intelligence, science & knowledge to destroy suffering & its source. A
7 Paying homage to sacred objects via rites & rituals, making offerings, praying is not Buddhism.
8 To attain liberation we first examine things closely to come to know & understand their true nature.
9 Buddhism sets no store by making libations of holy water, or any externals, spirits or celestial beings.
10 Rather, Buddhism depends on reason & insight; it doesn't demand conjecture or supposition.
11 Buddhism demands we act in line with our own insight, not take any other's word for anything.
12 Religion is a many-sided thing. Many look at it from the wrong angle, & Buddhism is no exception.
13 Buddhism: a practical method of liberating self from suffering by realising true nature of things.
14 Ceremonies like setting up trays of food as offerings don't fit with Buddhist principles.
15 The Dharma, now so overlaid by ceremony, has been obscured, falsified & changed.
16 Some are attracted to Buddhism for its moral teaching: harmony, honesty, gratitude, good, merit.
17 Some see Buddhism as truth: knowing emptiness, transience, non-self, dukkha, way to end of suffering.
18 Some see Buddhism as religion: practice morality, concentration, insight, release from suffering.
19 Some see Buddhism as psychology: describing the nature of the mind in remarkable detail.
20 Some see Buddhism as scientific: that is verifiable by clear experimental proof using introspection.
21 Some see Buddhism as culture, some aspects held in common, others better & higher than other cultures
22 Of these, the one a real Buddhist should take most interest in is Buddhism as religion.
23 Look at Buddhism as direct practical method to gain knowledge of true nature of things.
25 At very least see Buddhism as art of living – being a skilful and competent human being living well.
26 We need to develop “Three Lustres” - moral purity, tranquil & steady mind, wisdom & clear insight.
27 As our guide to living, Buddhism brings spiritual cheer & joy, disperses depression & disillusionment.
28 One who organises life in accordance with Buddhist Art of Living is victor over all things about them.
29 Victory over animals, people, possessions is genuine bliss.
30 Buddha Dhamma will enrapture & nourish a mind that has developed a taste for it.
31 Real Buddhism is not books, manuals, repetition of formulas, rites or rituals.
32 Real Buddhism is practice via body, speech & mind that destroys the defilements.
33 Morality stops short of eliminating craving, aversion & delusion, so can't do away with suffering.
34 Buddhism aims at eliminating various kinds of suffering attendant on birth, aging, pain & death.
35 Buddhism is system leading to organised practical understanding of true nature of things - “what is what”.
36 To know how things really are in all clarity is to attain the “Fruit of the Path”.
37 Knowing “what is what” means disenchantment with things takes the place of fascination.
38 When we know “what is what” deliverance from suffering comes about automatically.
39 Seeing all things as impermanent, unsatisfactory & not selves, there's nothing worth attaching ourselves to.
40 Realising nothing's worth attaching selves to, there's a slipping free from their controlling power.
41 Essentially the Buddha's teaching is nothing but knowledge of “what is what” i.e. true nature of things.
42 First Noble Truth which points out all things are suffering tells us precisely what things are like.
43 But we fail to realise all things are a source of suffering & so we desire them.
44 If we knew all as source of suffering, not worth desiring/grasping at, we'd be sure not to desire them.
45 Second Noble Truth points out that desire is the cause of suffering.
46 People desire this, that & the other simply because they don't understand nature of desire.
47 3rd Noble Truth points out freedom from suffering, Nirvana consists in complete extinguishing of desire.
48 People don't realise Nirvana can be attained at any time/place, soon as desire's completely extinguished.
49 Not knowing facts of life, people not interested in extinguishing desire, nor Nirvana.
50 4th Noble Truth is Path i.e. the method for extinguishing desire.
51 People don't recognise it as very point of support, their foothold to be reinforced.
52 People not interested in Noble Path which is a most horrifying piece of ignorance.
53 We can see 4 Noble Truths tell us clearly just “what is what” & Noble Path is the most precious thing.
54 All phenomena arise as result of causes; by eliminating causes, all phenomena may be brought to end.
55 Nil's permanent, just effects arising from causes, developing through them & ceasing with their cessation.
56 All phenomena are merely products of causes.
57 World's just perpetual flux of natural forces incessantly interacting & changing.
58 Buddhism points out all things are devoid of any self entity.
59 All just perpetual flux of change so inherently unsatisfactory as lacking freedom & subject to causality.
60 Unsatisfactoriness ends when process stops; this happens when the causes are eliminated.
61 Thus all things just appearances, so shouldn't be fooled into liking/disliking them.
62 Rendering mind truly free involves escaping completely from causal chain by eliminating causes.
63 Buddha became monk to answer what is suffering, its cause & what is freedom from it.
64 To attain perfect & right knowledge of “what is what” is ultimate in skill – and aim of Buddhism.
65 Another important teaching is 3 characteristics – impermanence, unsatisfactoriness, non-selfhood.
66 Saying all things r impermanent = all things change perpetually, nothing is unchanged even for an instant.
67 Saying all things r unsatisfactory = all inherently have property of conducing 2 suffering & torment.
68 That all r not selves = in nothing at all is an entity we might regard as its “self” or call “its own”.
69 If we grasp or cling to things the result is bound to be suffering.
70 Things r more dangerous than fire, since we can see fire & keep away, while things are fire we can't see.
71 Thus we go about voluntarily picking up handfuls of fire, which is inevitably painful.